gold
SELECT DISTINCT location, lat, lng FROM circuits WHERE country = 'Austria'
this statement states no ordering of its own
sha256:dac40bfafb0a33dae8f3e95037639075713e0230dd22f044c325f818246fcfef
R-SET NOT_EQUAL
formula_1 · mini_dev_postgresql from https://bird-bench.oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com/minidev.zip (sha256 cc48ba16838204e4e214512030cb572eeb5f7bcdd999bae4b9b6ff12ec13b92f, downloaded 2026-09-07), member minidev/MINIDEV/mini_dev_postgresql.json
How many times the circuits were held in Austria? Please give their location and coordinates.
the hint the set supplies: location coordinates refers to (lat,lng); Austria refers to country = 'Austria';
NOT_EQUAL states that these two statements disagree on this data under this rule. It does not state which of them is wrong.
read by hand, 2026-09-04: B harmless: one distinct row repeated; DISTINCT added by the prediction; a list under twice the answer with every row present
2 distinct rows, 3 rows
a maintainer's reading of this question, out of classification.json, copied from plans/reports/prediction-mode-260904-real-predictions/classification.json. It is not a verdict and nothing above it was computed from it.
SELECT DISTINCT location, lat, lng FROM circuits WHERE country = 'Austria'
this statement states no ordering of its own
sha256:dac40bfafb0a33dae8f3e95037639075713e0230dd22f044c325f818246fcfef
SELECT circuits.location, circuits.lat, circuits.lng
FROM circuits
WHERE circuits.country = 'Austria'
this statement states no ordering of its own
sha256:4c58b8a0129fe4c1ab987463bed3884166ef0d785c9549fce99a3e570667559d
The marked tokens are where the two texts differ. Two statements that differ everywhere can return the same rows, and two that differ in one token can return other rows; the verdict above is read off the results.
from counterexample.json, 0 rows, up to 25 shown per side
| side | locationtext | latfloat4 | lngfloat4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| no rows |
from counterexample.json, 1 row, up to 25 shown per side
| side | locationtext | latfloat4 | lngfloat4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| second | Spielburg | 47.2197 | 14.7647 |
set(second_rows) == set(gold_rows), float4/float8 cells as Python float as psycopg2 returns them, numeric as Decimal
https://github.com/bird-bench/mini_dev/blob/main/evaluation/evaluation_ex.py
result_eq: equal row counts and equal column counts, each row unordered as a quick rejection, then the two equal as a list when the gold text holds ORDER BY and as a multiset otherwise, under some permutation of the columns; DISTINCT is not stripped and re-executed, and the cells are PostgreSQL's as psycopg2 returns them
ruiqi-zhong/test-suite-sql-eval, exec_eval.py, result_eq, at commit 48cb78ec: https://github.com/ruiqi-zhong/test-suite-sql-eval/blob/48cb78ecf7f610620206283846c76751b18a1326/exec_eval.py
The class states what makes these two results unequal under this rule, read off the two results and nothing else. It does not state which of the two statements is wrong.
from counterexample.json, 2 rows
| locationtext | latfloat4 | lngfloat4 |
|---|---|---|
| Spielburg | 47.2197 | 14.7647 |
| Styria | 47.2039 | 14.7478 |
from counterexample.json, 3 rows
| locationtext | latfloat4 | lngfloat4 |
|---|---|---|
| Spielburg | 47.2197 | 14.7647 |
| Styria | 47.2039 | 14.7478 |
| Spielburg | 47.2197 | 14.7647 |
A smell is a mechanical reason to read this gold statement again. It is a heuristic: it does not state that the statement is wrong, and a maintainer decides.
this statement orders by a text column holding only numbers, and ordering it as a number gives a different answer, so the gold may be sorting 9.5 above 10
the statement states no top level ORDER BY
{
"heuristic": true,
"reason": "the statement states no top level ORDER BY"
}
this statement cuts its result at a LIMIT that does not decide which rows come back, so a different but equally correct statement can return other rows and score zero
the statement states no LIMIT
{
"heuristic": true,
"reason": "the statement states no LIMIT"
}
rerun over the same rows in another physical order this statement gives another answer, so its result depends on how the rows are stored and not only on the data
{
"heuristic": true,
"rule": "R-SET",
"baseline_result_hash": "sha256:dac40bfafb0a33dae8f3e95037639075713e0230dd22f044c325f818246fcfef",
"baseline_result": {
"columns": [
{
"name": "location",
"declared_type": "text"
},
{
"name": "lat",
"declared_type": "float4"
},
{
"name": "lng",
"declared_type": "float4"
}
],
"row_count": 2,
"truncated": false,
"rows_shown": 2,
"rows": [
[
{
"type": "str",
"value": "Spielburg"
},
{
"type": "dec",
"value": "47.2197"
},
{
"type": "dec",
"value": "14.7647"
}
],
[
{
"type": "str",
"value": "Styria"
},
{
"type": "dec",
"value": "47.2039"
},
{
"type": "dec",
"value": "14.7478"
}
]
],
"result_hash": "sha256:dac40bfafb0a33dae8f3e95037639075713e0230dd22f044c325f818246fcfef"
},
"planner_statistics": {
"circuits": {
"last_analyze": "2026-09-14 12:50:57.990934+00",
"last_autoanalyze": null,
"n_mod_since_analyze": 0
}
},
"shuffle": {
"seed": "1",
"row_limit": 300000,
"tables": [
"circuits"
],
"tables_not_shuffled": [],
"tables_skipped_for_size": {
"laptimes": 400524,
"legalities": 427907,
"posthistory": 303155,
"trans": 1056320,
"yearmonth": 383282
},
"tables_not_reached_by_a_copy": {}
},
"shuffled_copies": {
"run": true,
"verdict": "equal",
"differs": false,
"result_hash": "sha256:dac40bfafb0a33dae8f3e95037639075713e0230dd22f044c325f818246fcfef",
"result": {
"columns": [
{
"name": "location",
"declared_type": "text"
},
{
"name": "lat",
"declared_type": "float4"
},
{
"name": "lng",
"declared_type": "float4"
}
],
"row_count": 2,
"truncated": false,
"rows_shown": 2,
"rows": [
[
{
"type": "str",
"value": "Spielburg"
},
{
"type": "dec",
"value": "47.2197"
},
{
"type": "dec",
"value": "14.7647"
}
],
[
{
"type": "str",
"value": "Styria"
},
{
"type": "dec",
"value": "47.2039"
},
{
"type": "dec",
"value": "14.7478"
}
]
],
"result_hash": "sha256:dac40bfafb0a33dae8f3e95037639075713e0230dd22f044c325f818246fcfef"
}
},
"plan_variant": {
"run": false,
"reason": "the plan variant was not asked for"
}
}
this statement returns the same whole row more than once and never says DISTINCT, so a statement answering the same question once per row disagrees on multiplicity alone
{
"heuristic": true,
"rows": 2,
"distinct_rows": 2,
"repeated_rows": 0,
"largest_repeat": 1,
"result_bounded": false,
"distinct_stated": true,
"set_operation": false,
"not_applicable": "the statement states DISTINCT, so it cannot repeat a row"
}
SELECT DISTINCT location, lat, lng FROM circuits WHERE country = 'Austria'
result_hash sha256:dac40bfafb0a33dae8f3e95037639075713e0230dd22f044c325f818246fcfef recomputed from this JSON: match
record_hash sha256:1a4e5b60ed38cf95c1468773d48288d3421f5078f5c36cdc99f5b110bee942ad recomputed from this JSON: match
from evidence-gold.json, 2 rows
| locationtext | latfloat4 | lngfloat4 |
|---|---|---|
| Spielburg | 47.2197 | 14.7647 |
| Styria | 47.2039 | 14.7478 |
SELECT circuits.location, circuits.lat, circuits.lng
FROM circuits
WHERE circuits.country = 'Austria'
result_hash sha256:4c58b8a0129fe4c1ab987463bed3884166ef0d785c9549fce99a3e570667559d recomputed from this JSON: match
record_hash sha256:f2e5aea0ff21fadaac1959635206a5e0dd8ed973c0635950fc860672b100013f recomputed from this JSON: match
from evidence-second.json, 3 rows
| locationtext | latfloat4 | lngfloat4 |
|---|---|---|
| Spielburg | 47.2197 | 14.7647 |
| Styria | 47.2039 | 14.7478 |
| Spielburg | 47.2197 | 14.7647 |
re-run this statement read-only against PostgreSQL 16.15 (Debian 16.15-1.pgdg13+2) on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, 64-bit | server=172.17.0.2/32:5432 | database=bird under the session settings and over the data this record's fixture digest names, and compare the two results under R-SET
re-run this statement read-only against PostgreSQL 16.15 (Debian 16.15-1.pgdg13+2) on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, 64-bit | server=172.17.0.2/32:5432 | database=bird under the session settings and over the data this record's fixture digest names, and compare the two results under R-SET